Pakistan’s Operation Against Tehreek Labbaik Pakistan: Between State Authority and Public Sentiment:

Introduction:

In recent years, Pakistan has witnessed repeated confrontations between the government and the religious-political group Tehreek Labbaik Pakistan (TLP). Founded in 2015, TLP rose to prominence through its strong stance on defending the honor of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and its massive street power. While the party enjoys a considerable support base across the country, its methods of protest—often involving road blockages and sit-ins—have placed it on a collision course with the state.

The latest grand operation launched by the Pakistani government against TLP protesters once again highlighted the tension between state authority and public sentiment. The crackdown drew attention both nationally and internationally, sparking debates about governance, democracy, and the limits of protest in a religiously sensitive society.

—

Background: The Rise of Tehreek Labbaik Pakistan:

Tehreek Labbaik Pakistan emerged from the Barelvi school of thought, advocating strict punishment for those accused of blasphemy. Its first major political appearance came during the 2017 Faizabad sit-in, where thousands of supporters paralyzed Islamabad for days, demanding the resignation of a federal minister. That protest ended with a controversial agreement between the group and the state, signaling TLP’s growing influence.

Since then, TLP has positioned itself as a defender of religious values, attracting massive crowds during demonstrations. Its leadership, including late Khadim Hussain Rizvi and later Saad Rizvi, maintained a fiery rhetoric that resonated with a section of the population frustrated with mainstream politics. However, this popularity also led to several violent confrontations with law enforcement agencies over the years.

The Recent Government Operation:

The government’s latest operation against TLP came in response because Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan was protesting on the streets for this reason. Their position was that Pakistan should not recognize Israel and that Pakistan should back down from the Abraham Accords that it has signed. The entire protest of TLP was in this regard that the government did not recognize their position at all, which is completely wrong. All this should not have happened in an Islamic country. The way  TLP people were massacred is a complete violation of human rights and a brutal use of force. large-scale protests that disrupted major highways, affected trade routes, and brought daily life to a standstill in several cities, including Lahore and Rawalpindi. Authorities claimed that the protests were becoming increasingly violent, with reports of clashes leading to injuries on both sides.

The government justified the crackdown as a law-and-order necessity, arguing that the group’s activities threatened national stability. Special police units and paramilitary forces were deployed to clear blocked roads and arrest key organizers. The operation was accompanied by temporary internet blackouts in some regions and restricted media coverage to prevent misinformation and escalation.

However, critics argued that the state’s heavy-handed approach reflected a failure to engage in dialogue and risked alienating a large portion of the population sympathetic to TLP’s cause. Human rights activists also raised concerns over mass arrests and alleged excessive use of force during the operation.

Public and Media Reaction:

The public reaction to the operation was deeply divided. Supporters of the government praised the authorities for asserting control and preventing chaos, while many others condemned the move as an attack on the right to peaceful protest. On social media, hashtags like #TLPProtest, #GrandOperation, and #PakistanPolitics trended for days, reflecting the polarized sentiments.

Traditional media outlets walked a careful line, often focusing on official statements rather than detailed coverage of the protests. Independent journalists and citizen reporters used platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook Live to share on-ground footage, despite the risk of censorship. International media, too, highlighted the operation as part of Pakistan’s ongoing struggle to balance religion, politics, and governance.

Political and Religious Impact:

Politically, the TLP crackdown raised several important questions about the government’s strategy in dealing with religious parties. The group, while banned temporarily in the past, has repeatedly managed to regain its legal status and participate in elections. This has made it a unique force in Pakistani politics—neither fully mainstream nor entirely marginalized.

The operation also sent a message to other religious organizations that the state is willing to use force if necessary to maintain order. Yet, history shows that such measures rarely weaken groups like TLP in the long term; instead, they often strengthen their narrative of victimhood and resilience. For opposition parties, the episode became an opportunity to criticize the government’s inconsistency—sometimes negotiating with TLP and other times suppressing it.

Religiously, the event reignited discussions about the role of clerics in politics and how religious symbolism influences national discourse. Many scholars and civil society members emphasized that while religious sentiments must be respected, they should not be used to justify violence or political coercion.

Human Rights and Governance Concerns:

From a human rights perspective, the operation against TLP raises significant ethical and legal questions. The Constitution of Pakistan guarantees the right to protest and freedom of expression, but it also empowers the state to act when national security or public safety is threatened. The challenge lies in striking a balance between these two principles.

Reports from human rights organizations highlighted the need for transparency, accountability, and judicial oversight during such operations. Arbitrary arrests and media blackouts can undermine democratic values and erode public trust in state institutions. Civil society groups called for independent investigations into the clashes to ensure that both protesters and security personnel are treated fairly under the law.

The Broader Message for Pakistan:

The confrontation between TLP and the government represents more than just a political conflict—it reflects Pakistan’s ongoing struggle to define the boundaries between religious activism and state sovereignty. Managing such tensions requires more than temporary solutions; it demands consistent policies, open dialogue, and reforms in how the state engages with religious organizations.

If history is any guide, suppressing movements like TLP without addressing their root causes can lead to further polarization. A sustainable approach would involve building trust, promoting civic education, and ensuring that religious narratives are integrated into democratic frameworks rather than used to challenge them.

Conclusion:

The recent operation against Tehreek Labbaik Pakistan underscores the delicate balance Pakistan must maintain between enforcing state authority and respecting public sentiment. While maintaining law and order is crucial, the use of force alone cannot resolve deep-seated ideological divisions. True stability will come only when dialogue replaces confrontation, justice replaces suppression, and inclusion replaces isolation.

In the end, Pakistan’s strength will depend not on how forcefully it silences dissent, but on how wisely it listens to its people—no matter how divided their voices may be.